Order Out Of Chaos: The Landmarks Of Freemasonry

Order Out Of Chaos: The Landmarks Of Freemasonry

Order out of ChaosAlthough many books have been written on the theory of the masonic landmarks, few are available that provide a complete overview of the centuries of attempts at making any one set of landmarks universally apart of the Masonic Code.This book provides the unique perspective of the many attempts by Authors and Unique men in Masonry. Beginning with the basic concepts of what constitutes a Landmark, each chapter then traces the steps taken in applying what has been written into what we as modern masons use today in our daily life.The book assumes the reader has a basic knowledge of the basic concepts of Freemasonry. It’s very well suited for identification of the dynamics of masonry around the world. As no one jurisdiction is the same. So is the case for the landmarks they have instated as model for masonic progression.The reader will further his research into the days of the guilds and early Masonic gatherings around Europe. It explains in short the rift between France as well as Masonry in Germany, Scotland and Switzerland.The reader will find plenty of modern information as well. The constitutions of Masonry as coded by the 1717 Masons is included. This set of code is explained in simple detail and has been considered the “Unspoken” written landmark of how operations of a Grand Lodge. as well, a subordinate lodge should be run.A few of old masonic charges are included to demonstrate where Masonic points, word play and universal prayers came from. And reflect how the craft has taken shape from the operative to the speculative.

What Is A Landmark?

LandmarkThe term “Landmark” is used to define the set of principles that many Freemasons claim to be ancient and unchangeable precepts of Masonry. In Masonic history, there are many efforts made by masonic authors to deal with the Landmarks of our Craft and it is generally agreed that the definition of what the Landmarks are is not easy.They are said to be the foundation on which Freemasonry stands; having existed since time immemorial. In other words, they are the core beliefs that define us and cannot be altered, repealed, or removed without doing major damage to the Fraternity.The oldest known Masonic writing, the Regius Manuscript or “Poem of Moral Duties,” was discovered to be a Masonic document by a non-Mason, J. O. Halliwell, in 1839. It was written about 1390 and was given the name “Regius” because it was found in the Royal Library of England. It is now a part of the British Museum.The manuscript, an epic poem That’s existence has been known for quite a TIME, but it’s contents were mistaken until Mr. Halliwell-Phillips drew attention to it in a paper “On the introduction of Freemasonry into England,” read before the Society of Antiquaries in the 1838-9 session.He thereafter published two small editions of a work entitled “The Early History of Freemasonry in England,” giving a transcript of the poem. Some common Masonic Ritual terms in use today are found in it such as “So Mote It Be.”It should be stressed that boundary lines or border marks, have in all ages been regarded by men as most important and zealously kept. In the Bible, they are regarded as sacred and frequently designated by stone pillars. It is for this reason that the Masonic term “Landmark” is considered to have been derived from scripture. In Deuteronomy 27:17 we find: “Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor’s Landmark”.Proverbs 22:28 says, “Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set,”In Jewish law: “Thou shalt not remove thy neighbors’ landmark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance”. Many believe that this illustrates that Masonic Landmarks have been inherited and are visible/recognized boundaries even if they are not written/defined/enumerated/codified.However, the regularity” of a Grand Lodge or impenitent body that is judged in the context of the “Landmarks”. Whilst each Grand Lodge is self-governing with no single body exercising authority over the whole of Freemasonry, the interpretation of these principles can and do vary, leading to controversies of recognition.

The 1700’s Organization

The 1700's OrganizationIn 1720 George Payne, Grand Master of England, compiled the General Regulations, which were approved by the Grand Lodge of England in 1721 and published by Dr. James Anderson in 1723. Regulation XXXIX reads “Every Annual Grand Lodge has an inherent power and Authority to make new Regulations or to alter these, for the real benefit of this Ancient Fraternity; provided always that the old Land-Marks be carefully preserved.” The first attempt to codify the old Landmarks of Freemasonry was made by Albert G. Mackey as an article in the October 1858 edition of the American Quarterly Review of Freemasonry.Then in his Text Book of Masonic Jurisprudence. Since then, his Ancient Landmarks of Freemasonry (sometimes referred to as Mackey’s Twenty-Five or Mackey’s Landmarks) has been adopted by a number of Grand Lodges (mainly North American) as the definitive list. As you know, In present Masonry each year the Conference of Grand Masters receives requests from various “new” Grand Lodges seeking recognition, and the Conference makes recommendations which are generally followed by our Grand Lodge as well as most other Grand Lodges.The first standard of recognition is “Legitimacy of Origin.” The second, is “Exclusive Territorial Jurisdiction, except by mutual consent and/or treaty.” And the third, is “Adherence to the Ancient Landmarks specifically, a Belief in God, the Volume of Sacred Law as an indispensable part of the Furniture of the Lodge, and the prohibition of the discussion of politics and religion. Of course they/we are concerned about more than just the organizational structure of Freemasonry and how Grand Lodges are organized, and so we need to consider also what might be called
the personal Landmarks of a Master Mason.These are the moral lessons and fraternal obligations taught in our ritual and which must ultimately reside in our hearts. These Landmarks should guide our thoughts, words, and actions, and define for us what it means to be a Freemason and how to
act like a Master Mason.When applying for membership to a subordinate Lodge of a just and rightfully constituted Grand Lodge. A man is to identify with around ten attributes thatMasonry believes best defines the behavior of a Master Mason.
What are these ten “Landmark attributes?” – They were that a Mason:

  1. Believes in a Supreme Being
  2. Has Moral Values
  3. Exemplifies Honor and Integrity
  4. Believes in the Brotherhood of Man
  5. Fulfills obligations
  6. Practices Charity
  7. Exercises Brotherly Love
  8. Is committed to Family
  9. Demonstrates Patriotism
  10. Supports Widows and Orphans

We seek to be virtuous and honorable men. We believe that every human being has a claim upon our good offices, and we see it as our duty to assist in making the world a better, more loving, and more compassionate place. So we search for truth, we support justice, we show toleration, and we act charitably. Landmarks are supposed to be principles on which all Masons would agree. Unfortunately Masons and Grand Lodges have not unanimously agreed which items should be included on the list of things that are “universal, and cannot be altered,
repealed, or removed.”

The 25 Landmarks Of Dr. Albert G. Mackey

Dr. Albert G. Mackey
  1. The Modes of recognition.
  2. The division of Symbolic Masonry into three degrees.
  3. The legend of the third degree.
  4. The government of the fraternity by a presiding officer called a Grand Master, who is elected from the body of tile craft.
  5. The prerogative of the Grand Master to preside over every assembly of the craft, wheresoever and whensoever held.
  6. The prerogative of the Grand Master to grant dispensations for conferring degrees at irregular times.
  7. The prerogative of the Grand Master to grant dispensation for opening and holding lodges.
  8. The prerogative of the Grand Master to make Masons on sight.
  9. The necessity of Masons to congregate in lodges.
  10. The government of every lodge by a Master and two Wardens.
  11. The necessity that every lodge, when duly congregated, should be tyled.
  12. The right of every Mason to be represented in all general meetings of the craft and to instruct his representatives.
  13. The right of every Mason to appeal from the decision of his brethren in lodge convened, to the Grand Lodge or General Assembly of Masons.
  14. The right of every Mason to visit and sit in every regular lodge.
  15. That no visitor, not known to some brother present as a Mason, can enter a lodge without undergoing an examination.
  16. That no lodge can interfere in the business or labor of another lodge.
  17. That every Freemason is amendable to the laws and regulations of the Masonic Jurisdiction in which he resides.
  18. That every candidate for initiation must be a man, free born and of lawful age.
  19. That every Mason must believe in the existence of God as the Grand Architect of the Universe.
  20. That every Mason must believe in a resurrection to a future life.
  21. That a book of the law of God must constitute an indispensable part of the furniture of every lodge.
  22. That all men, in the sight of God, are equal and meet in the lodge on one common level.
  23. That Freemasonry is a secret society in possession of secrets that cannot be divulged.
  24. That Freemasonry consists of a speculative science founded on an operative art.
  25. That the landmarks of Masonry can never be changed. These constitute the landmarks, or as they have sometimes been called, “the body of Masonry,” in which it is not in the power of man or a body of men to make the least innovation.

Other Masonic Opinions Of The Landmarks

FC ToolsBrother and Dr. George Oliver in his ‘Historical Landmarks’ said in referring to the Four Old Lodges that formed the Premier Grand Lodge in 1717:“that every privilege which they collectively enjoyed by virtue of their immemorial rights, they should still continue to enjoy and that no law, rule or regulation should ever deprive them of such privilege, or encroach on any Landmark which was at that time established as the standard of Masonic government.” The Masonic government and Landmark Brother Oliver was referring to were the Old Charges, (The Charges of a Freemason,) which were contained in the “Constitutions of the Freemasons” of 1723.”Brother and General Albert Pike had said“The ancient charges show by what principles the relations of those of the fellowship to each other were regulated; and these may not improperly be said to have been ‘Landmarks’ of the Craft.”One Brother Elbert Bede has said “Freemasonry is the only Fraternity claiming to have landmarks, and the only Fraternity old enough to have Landmarks” under the accepted definition of a Landmark by Mackey “is that it must have existed from time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary.”

If you like what you see … recommend us.

 


Subscribe to The Northern Freemason – NEW ARTICLES by Email

This entry was posted in History and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Order Out Of Chaos: The Landmarks Of Freemasonry

  1. Wonderful energy……..Thank you very much for providing one more tool in the quarry of providing Masonic Awareness @ the Speed of Light.

  2. JakeMohns says:

    By Bill Hickey

    Coming from a Scottish Craft Lodge, there is a slightly different "take" on what a "Landmark" of the craft is. Unlike some of the North American authors who believe that there are as many as 50 or perhaps more landmarks of the order, the late W.Bro. Harry Carr, a world-renowned author and researcher, expressed it thus:

    "This is one of the most debatable subjects in Masonry and it gives rise to very wide differences of opinion. Any good dictionary will define a "Landmark", but Masonically the term requires a stricter definition. The best writers on the subject are unanimous on two essential points:
    (a) A landmark must have existed from the 'time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary', and
    (b) A landmark is an element in the form or essence of the Society of such importance that Freemasonry would not longer be Freemasonry if it were removed."

    Brother Carr continues:
    "Without the least desire to be dogmatic, the following is an attempt to compile a list of acceptable landmarks that would conform to the two point test:
    1. That a Mason professes a belief in God (the Supreme Being), the GAOTU.
    2. That the VSL is an essential and indispensable part of the Lodge, to be open in full view when the Brethren are at labour.
    3. That a Mason must be male, free-born, and of mature age.
    4. That a Mason, by his tenure, owes allegiance to the Sovereign and to the Craft.
    5. That a Mason believes in the immortality of the soul."

    The first 4 items above are derived directly from the "Old Charges" which date back to ca. 1390 or so, and are the oldest documents in the world belonging exclusively to the Craft. The last item, "immortality" is implicit in the religious beliefs of that period.

    Allegiance to the "Sovereign", of course, today means to the laws of the country in which you reside…whether you have a single head of government, or a body that governs.

    He then goes into a treatise on 10 of Mackey's "Landmarks" which are widely accepted in the USA (and perhaps parts of Canada) to reveal that many of them do not meet the two-point test, and are not "landmarks" per se, but more likely "traditions" which we have all come to accept as normal and a part of our Masonic craft.
    By Bill Hickey

  3. P. G. Normand, Jr. says:

    Bill Hickey's comments are spot on, and by quoting Harry Carr, he invokes analysis that is impeccable.

    In the article above, the writer states that George Oliver was "the Grand Master of England," and then refers to the London grand lodge of 1717 as "the Grand Lodge of England."

    However, it is important to correct this. George Oliver was not "the Grand Master of England," but was only "the grand master of grand lodge," there being only one grand lodge at that time, which did not have jurisdiction over the geographic territory of England, but only over lodges, and then, over only those lodges that willingly submitted to this new grand lodge.

    Further, this first grand lodge, did not have the name "Grand Lodge of England," nor did its members and officers consider it to be a geographic grand lodge with jurisdiction over, or limited to, a specific geographic territory. It was, in their mind, simply "the grand lodge," with jurisdiction over those lodges in London and Westminster that held warrants from the grand lodge.

    At the same time, there were, from before the creation of this grand lodge, other lodges throughout the British Isles that had either existed from time immemorial, or from before the creation of the grand lodge. It is the opinion of many Masonic scholars today that, after the development of speculative Freemasonry in Scotland in the early 17th century, that speculative Freemasonry then spread to England. We see Elias Ashmole being made a Freemason in Warrington, in Cheshire, in 1646. Its spread to London was facilitated by the presence of the Scottish Stewart Court in London, as well as by the large population base there, and the traffic between London and Edinburgh.

    Many of these lodges that existed before 1717, were never invited to join or accept a warrant from this new grand lodge, nor can we assume that they would have been interested in doing so if they had been invited. Further, there was no expectation or obligation on these lodges to affiliate under the banner of this new so-called "grand lodge."

    By the same token, after the formation of the London grand lodge of 1717, lodges continued to be formed in Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland in the same traditional manner that lodges had always been formed. That is, by the "immemorial right" of Masons to meet and form lodges.

    Even after this new grand lodge began calling itself the "Grand Lodge of England," English lodges not under its jurisdiction continued to meet and work. The members and officers of the grand lodge commonly referred to these free lodges as "St. John's lodges," or "Ancient lodges," as they all adhered to what was considered to be a more ancient tradition than that of the lodges under the grand lodge.

Leave a Reply